Talk:4Sevens: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If I had one of each I'd test them under the same conditions to see the relative outputs. | If I had one of each I'd test them under the same conditions to see the relative outputs. | ||
:It's mentioned in the table, and in some places ANSI lumens are mentioned, but really I need to go in and mark everything on the page as OTF or ANSI lumens so there is less confusion. [[User:Brted|Brted]] 15:23, 8 December 2010 (EST) | :It's mentioned in the table, and in some places ANSI lumens are mentioned, but really I need to go in and mark everything on the page as OTF or ANSI lumens so there is less confusion. [[User:Brted|Brted]] 15:23, 8 December 2010 (EST) | ||
Which sounds like a lot of work. It'd probably be easier to convert the few (current) lights that use ANSI lumens to peak lumens instead. | |||
:It's not that bad. I fixed some of it already. I've been using manufacturer's lumen ratings, so I don't want to try to come up with my own set of numbers. [[User:Brted|Brted]] 19:08, 10 December 2010 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:08, 10 December 2010
Might be worth mentioning the reason that the S2 has a lower lumen output value than the R5 which it shouldn't have.
If I had one of each I'd test them under the same conditions to see the relative outputs.
- It's mentioned in the table, and in some places ANSI lumens are mentioned, but really I need to go in and mark everything on the page as OTF or ANSI lumens so there is less confusion. Brted 15:23, 8 December 2010 (EST)
Which sounds like a lot of work. It'd probably be easier to convert the few (current) lights that use ANSI lumens to peak lumens instead.
- It's not that bad. I fixed some of it already. I've been using manufacturer's lumen ratings, so I don't want to try to come up with my own set of numbers. Brted 19:08, 10 December 2010 (EST)